This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard.
(I checked the differences from the previous version. There is a nice
elaboration on a security issue that had not even bothered me the first
time. Nothing else appeared to be substantive.)
Yours,
Joel M. Halpern
-------------------------
Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4 and DHCPv6) Option for Civic
Addresses Configuration Information (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-civil-07.txt>draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-civil-07.txt
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=1592&filename=draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-civil>[Open
Web Ballot]
Note: Back on to check RFC Editor notes
Token: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Ted Hardie
Reviewer: Joel Halpern (reviewed -06)
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
