Good that it was helpful! One outstanding issue.....
--On 2. februar 2006 11:22 -0500 JP Vasseur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- The order in which the two mechanisms are introduced in section 2 and 4 was confusing to me at first read. I think it would flow better if the midpoint to headend signalling was mentioned first, and the headend to midpoint mechanism was defined afterwards, saying something like - A head-end LSR to trigger on every LSR whose next hop is a loose hop or an abstract node the re-evaluation of the current path in order to detect a potential more optimal path, which may result in the mid-point LSR using the mechanism above to signal the existence of such a more optimal path (Note: The English of the paragraph reads oddly, given that the bullets do not form complete sentences without the introductory text; it's possible to do this better, I think.)I kept the same order (because the first mechanism is likely to be the one more commonly used - that said, they're not exclusive) but I reworded a bit since indeed clarify could be improved. Thanks.
isn't the answer to the headend-to-midpoint query an instance of the midpoint-to-headend signal?
from the doc, I understood it as if the headend can't tell the difference between a spontaneous reoptimization and a reoptimization done in response to a headend query - but there may be a difference I missed.
Not terribly important!
pgp3fV0Xnjt5R.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
