I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this specification
(for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Document: draft-ietf-ipsec-ike-auth-ecdsa-05.txt
Intended Status: Proposed Standard (WG submission)
Shepherding AD: Russ Housley (assumed - no I-D tracker entry yet!)
Review Trigger: IETF Last Call (ends 6 March 2006)

Summary:
This one is essentially ready for PS. There are a couple of editorial fixes which would mainly help IANA.

I am assuming that somebody will have or will be going to verify the test vectors.

Editorial (refer to your AD/WG chair for guidance on respinning the doc):

s1, para 2 contains the assertion 'For any given level of security against the best attacks known, ECDSA signatures are smaller than RSA signatures and ECDSA keys require less bandwidth than DSA keys; there are also advantages of computational speed and efficiency in many settings.' If the reference [LV] backs up this assertion it would be good to reference it here also. If not it would be good to have some other reference that justifies this assertion.

(actually editorial+): s5: It would be useful to give the three methods mnemonic names which can be placed in the IANA registry and document them in s5.


s1: Acronyms IPsec, RSA and DSA need expansion.

s3: Acronym MAC needs expansion.

s3, table: To avoid confusion with references, the code points (e.g., [19]) currently enclosed in square brackets would be better in round brackets.

s6: It might be helpful to explicitly bracket y^2 = x^3 - 3 x + b modulo p - I think this is supposed to be y^2 = (x^3 - 3 x + b) modulo p

s7.1: BTW IKEv2 has made it to RFC - RFC4306.

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to