I can see, given this clarification, how the text in 7.2 can mean that.
How about, instead of "the <url> element can appear as the <config>
parameter" we change "as" to "instead of", so taht the sentences
becomes "the <url> element can appear instead of the <config> parameter".
I certainly did not realize in reading that this was the intent.
With the other tweaks Rob has suggested, this would clarify that
<config> really is out of scope for this document.
Yours,
Joel
At 05:49 PM 2/24/2006, Andy Bierman wrote:
Firstly, the text refers to "the <url> element can appear as the
<config> parameter..." As such, there appears to be a requirement
that whatever the data model defines <config> to be, it must be
allowed to have a URL as its contents. Can we say this somehow in 7.2?
No.
<url> appears instead of the <config> element.
It is not part of any data model.
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
