Looks like this could use an RFC Editor Note - here's some possible draft
text that should be placed at the end of Section 3.3 (after figure 3):

        The use of 32-bit sequence numbers vs. 64-bit extended sequence
        numbers is determined by the security association (SA) management
        protocol that is used to create the SA.  For IKEv2 [RFC4306] this
        is negotiated via Transform Type 5, and the default for ESP is to
        use 64-bit extended sequence numbers in the absence of negotiation
        (e.g., see Section 2.2.1 of [RFC4303]).

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Senior Technologist
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
[EMAIL PROTECTED]        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Spencer Dawkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 4:26 PM
> To: General Area Review Team
> Cc: David McGrew; Russ Housley; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-mcgrew-aes-gmac-esp-02.txt
> 
> I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this 
> specification
> (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
> 
> Summary: This document is almost ready for publication as a Proposed 
> Standard. A lot of material changed since my previous review 
> of 01 at Last 
> Call time, but I didn't see any problems.
> 
> In my review of version 01 of this document, I asked for help for 
> implementors in distinguishing 32-bit and 64-bit sequence 
> numbers (review at 
> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg00355
> .html). David 
> agreed that this would be a good thing to add (at 
> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg00356
> .html), but I 
> didn't see that this change had happened in version 02 (I would have 
> expected a change somewhere in 3.3).
> 
> My apologies for missing the change, if it's there. It's been 
> a long week, 
> of course...
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Spencer 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
> 

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to