These documents appear ready for publication.
The changes to the security document address my concerns (and make
other useful improvements.)
id-nits still notes that the applicability document appears to use
2119 language without a 2119 reference, and has many "references"
that are not "referenced". I did not see any indication of
significant changes in language usage. (Either I am starting at
shadows, or the RFC Editor will deal with it I guess.)
Yours,
Joel M. Halpern
------
TSV DDP/RDMAP Security (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 4
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rddp-security-09.txt>draft-ietf-rddp-security-09.txt
Note: PROTO Sherpherd: David Black ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Applicability of Remote Direct Memory Access Protocol (RDMA) and
Direct Data Placement (DDP) (Informational)
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rddp-applicability-06.txt>draft-ietf-rddp-applicability-06.txt
Note: PROTO Shepherd: David Black ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Token: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Jon Peterson
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
