I had reviewed version 02 of this draft at LC call time. Version 04
addresses the only issue I identified with version 02. I would say "ready
for publication as a proposed standard".
Thanks,
Spencer Dawkins
I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this specification
(for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Summary: This document is almost ready for publication as a Proposed
Standard (although I would have expected a BCP, since I don't see how the
specification would ever advance beyond Proposed Standard, but you guys
are the IESG, of course).
I agree with Geoff's note at
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg40438.html, but
otherwise, the document looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Spence
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
