Thanks for taking it in that spirit!
If it's approved, since it's an experiment, we'll find
out who's right in a year...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The GenART review of the -01 version of this draft lead to
a discussion between a former IETF Chair and the current IETF
Chair that started out with:
However, I am going to take the unusual step of declaring that I'm not
going to address a single one of them as a result of Last Call -
because
in every case, the points you raise are deliberate design choices in
the
way I constructed IONs.
On that basis, I see no point in re-reviewing the -02 version.
This draft is (quite appropriately) in Brian's and Harald's hands
to deal with - both are experienced experts in the IETF process
issues that this draft deals with.
Note: Please do not read this email as pique or annoyance - this
is a fairly obvious process optimization for a rather unusual draft.
Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Senior Technologist
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748
+1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
