This is a GenART review of draft-ietf-dnsext-nsid-02, which is in IETF
Last Call. Please wait for your AD's instructions before making any
updates that might follow from this review. For further information
about GenART, please have a look at
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html
Summary
This draft is clear. There is one issue that was undoubtedly raised in
past discussions, but needs to be stated anyway. Other than that, there
are two typos to be fixed.
Details
1. Section 3.1 describes the design issues that led to the choice of
representation. The section concludes with three bullets suggesting
default and alternative usages. The second and third bullets use
small-letter "should" to recommend that the usages they describe require
explicit enabling by the operator.
I would have expected to see some of this reasoning captured in the
Security Considerations section, and those recommendations for
design/configuration given SHOULD force.
2. Typo, 5th line of the Abstract: "mechanism" -> "mechanisms".
3. Typo, IANA Considerations: "ENDS" -> "EDNS".
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
