Orly, I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-orly-atommib-rfc3895bis-00.txt .
For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. Section 3.4 says: 3.4. DS1 Terminology The terminology used in this document to describe error conditions on a DS1 interface as monitored by a DS1 device are based on the late but not final document of what became the ANSI T1.231 standard [ANSI-T1.231]. If the definition in this document does not match the definition in the ANSI T1.231 document, the implementer should follow the definition described in this document. The ANSI T1.231 standard has been complete for a while now: [ANSI-T1.231] American National Standard for Telecommunications -- Digital Hierarchy -- Layer 1 In-Service Digital Transmission Performace Monitoring, T1.231.02, October 2003. Nit: "Performace" is missing an "n" in that reference. If the terminology cannot be aligned (and I would not change terms in the actual MIB definition solely for alignment), specific differences from T1.231 terminology should be explained in subsections of Section 3.4, and the warning about differences from T1.231 either removed or revised to say that any significant differences are explained in the definitions that follow. I see that a MIB Doctor review has been performed on this MIB and hence have not reviewed the actual MIB definitions. Thanks, --David ---------------------------------------------------- David L. Black, Senior Technologist EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 ---------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
