I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>.
Summary - This document is ready for publication as BCP. I have a suggestion, and two questions, but it's ready as-is. Comments - - I wondered if "IETF Trust" should be added to the Terminology section. - When comparing Section 2.8 of this document with 5.6 of RFC 3978, I didn't see any occurances of "ISOC" in the target section, but the text in 2.8 says to replace "ISOC" with "IETF Trust". I'm assuming this is a cut-and-paste error, and it's harmless if it is (no change to resulting text), but wanted to mention it now. - And the 64-dollar question - this draft is basically diffs to RFC 3978; would the resulting RFC be a republish with the diffs applied, or would it look like this draft and require the reader to apply the diffs? Please look at these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Thanks, Spencer Dawkins (My apologies for posting from my Yahoo account. E-mail life in the Dallas area is Not Good) _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
