Thomas/Mark,
I am the assigned Gen-ART Last Call reviewer for this document.
For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at:
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html
Please consider these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive, and ask your AD for advice on how to deal with them.
Document: draft-ietf-l3vpn-ppvpn-mcast-reqts-08.txt
Reviewer: Eric Gray
Summary:
I have some "structural" comments/questions/observations, but I believe
this document is otherwise ready to publish as an Informational RFC.
I cannot make a judgement on the "severity" of these comments/questions
and would prefer to leave that to the AD.
Comments/Questions:
The placement of the "Contributors" section is unusual. It occurs before
the table of contents. What would be wrong with listing contributors in
(or around) an "Authors' Addresses" section? I would suggest making two
subsections under "Authors' Addresses" section: Editor and Contributors.
The document makes extensive use of RFC 2119 formality, yet is intended
as an "Informational" RFC. I believe this has happened previously, so
this is clearly not setting a precedent. However, it does not make
sense to me to assert "normative language" in an Informational RFC. An
Informational RFC that does so could very easily be misrepresented as a
"Standards Track" RFC.
--
Eric
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
