You have two choices one respin the document and we proceed as normal.
This is a very very minor editorial comment that does not affect the WG last call or IESG approval. The second alternative is a note to the RFC editor when it goes into 48 hour last call. I don't understand why drama numbers have to have assignment policies they are just numbers. > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexander Mayrhofer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 7:32 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-enum-validation-arch-03.txt > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The example in Figure 2 uses what appear to be real phone > > numbers (or what could be real phone numbers) in Switzerland. > > That's not a good idea - see Section 3, subsection 6 of: > > > > http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html > > > > It's not clear to me whether the fictitious phone numbers described > > in the ID-Checklist are sufficient for the examples required > > in Figure 2. If fictitious phone numbers in Switzerland are used, > > please describe them as fictitious and please provide the IESG > > with a reference showing that they are fictitious so that they > > can be added to the Checklist's list of available fictitious > > phone numbers. > > David, > > thanks for performing the review. We have discussed the issue, and would > appreciate feedback on how to proceed. Here's what we've got: > > - Drama numbers seem to be available in +1 (North America etc.) and +44 > (UK). There are no drama numbers in Switzerland and Austria (although the > Austrian Regulator RTR recommends to use incomplete numbers (eg. truncated > by 2 or 3 digits). The allocation policies in the ranges from which those > drama numbers are taken fulfill the "Variant 1" case (assignment via CSP). > > - However, none of those +1/+44 drama numbers have assignment policies > which > fulfill the "Variant 2" case (direct assignment to user) > > So, our choices now are: > > - Leave the number out completely in the example of variant 2. > - Use a drama number for variant 2, nevertheless it would _not_ be > assigned > that way, and add a note about this deficiency. > - Use truncated "real" numbers as recommended by the Austrian Regulator. > > We'd appreciate feedback on what would be preferred - probably this can > even > be addressed in a completely different way? > > thanks, > > Alex & Bernie. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
