This document appears ready for publication as a Proposed Standard.
I could pick nits on the attribute names, but the usage is internally
consistent even if it strikes this outsider as slightly odd. SO it
is probably better not to mess with it.
I could also wonder as to whether the security considerations is up
to snuff, but it seems to me that if Sam is happy with that, I can
live with it. (It is three short paragraphs.)
nit: id-nits reports two missing references.
Joel
----
SEC Secure Shell Public-Key Subsystem for Proposed Standard
draft-ietf-secsh-publickey-subsystem-07.txt
AD: Sam Harman
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
