Hi,

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Draft: draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation-01.txt
Reviewer: Gonzalo Camarillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Review Date: 13 October 2006
IETF LC Date: 9 October 2006

Summary:

This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should
be fixed before publication.


Comments:

This draft has lines and pages that are too long. Lines should not
exceed 72 characters and pages should not exceed 58 lines.

Acronyms should be expanded on their first use (e.g., AS, BGCP, RPSL).

It would be nice if the sections of the draft (excluding the Abstract)
would be numbered.

Having an example of the proposed representation in the Discussion
Section would be helpful.

The draft lacks an IANA Considerations Section.

Can an Informational RFC define a canonical representation for this type
of identifier?

The author's email address should appear in the Author's Address
Section; not in a different one.


Thanks,

Gonzalo



_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to