I've not yet finished to read the document but as it is derived from an RFC I don't expect to find any serious or technical issue, so IMHO the summary should be "ready"...
Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] PS (for gen-art reviewvers, in particular Eric Gray): all the lists of http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/ don't agree about next jo:, review draft-ietf-nemo-terminology-06.txt or draft-ietf-nemo-requirements-06.txt... _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
