I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-siemborski-imap-sasl-initial-response-06.txt
Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Review Date: 2007-03-16
IETF LC End Date: 2007-03-30
IESG Telechat date: not known
Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits
that should be fixed before publication.
Comments: Just a couple of nits
1) Section 3, 4th paragraph. The paragraph is a "Note", however, it
contains normative text (MUST, MUST NOT). Although this is not a rule,
in general notes should not contain normative text, but just
clarifications and motivations to the text. I would suggest to make the
Note with only the first sentence of the paragraph and start a new
paragraph with "Servers which implement this extension MUST ..."
2) Section 5, IANA. The text should identify with precision the registry
IANA has to operate. This registry is called "IMAP4 Capabilities
Registry" rather than "IMAP extensions". Source:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/imap4-capabilities
BR,
Miguel
--
Miguel A. Garcia tel:+358-50-4804586
Nokia Research Center Helsinki, Finland
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
