I've bounced off of draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-13.txt a couple of times now
(it's ending IETF LC today),
and fear I have to throw the "I'm not qualified to review this
document" flag.
I find the document unusually opaque and acronym rich, but I suspect
that's because it's focusing
deep in specialized technology. (I have no background with psuedo-
wire at all).
I can pass on that idnits doesn't complain (except for outdated
references). A nit that it missed:
the draft has superfluous line-feeds at the end of the page header
lines. The non-acronymed English
is well structured and the reference work seems to be correct from a
quick review.
Sorry I couldn't wrap my head around this enough to comment further
on the content at this time.
Maybe someone else in genart closer to the work can take a crack at it?
For archiving purposes, here's the completed (non)-review template:
----
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-pwe3-
vccv-13.txt
For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://
www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call
comments you may receive.
Summary: Unfortunately, I don't have the expertise to review this
draft.
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
