Thanks. I will post a DISCUSS position with this information.
At 05:14 PM 6/1/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Russ - Regarding this one:
INT Using the Host Identity Protocol with Legacy
Applications
(Experimental) - 4 of 6
draft-ietf-hip-applications-01.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Mark Townsley
Reviewer: David Black (already reviewed for LC)
The GenART review summary was "Right track; open issues". Private
email discussion with one of the draft authors (Tom Henderson) has
made significant progress on the issues, but also indicates that
a new version of the draft is clearly needed.
The original review is here:
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/reviews/draft-ietf-hip-applications-01
-black.txt
and the primary reason a new draft is needed is that the drawbacks
of "use of HITs and LSIs instead of IP addresses in HIP-unaware
applications" are not adequately discussed - see the review for
explanation of how this could cause problems in log files.
Mark - has a DNS expert ever looked at the DNS name extension
mechanism recommended in this draft? The IAB DNS draft referenced
in Section 3.2 appears to have expired:
http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-iab-dns-choices-04.txt
Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Senior Technologist
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748
+1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
