I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-mip4-radius-requirements-03.txt Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani Review Date: 15 Jun 2007 IESG Telechat date: 21 Jun 2007 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational. Three nits: 1) Section 1: s/[RFC3957] all based/[RFC3957], all based (The comma improves readibility) 2) Section 3: s/reqiuired/required 3) Section 3.1: In the first and third bullet item, it appears appropriate that the word "required" be upper-cased to denote its use as a normative declaration. More so since bullet item two contains the word "MUST" in normative fashion. I believe that the authors are making a normative set of declarations for the goals, so it appears uneven to have a MUST in the second bullet item and not a pair of REQUIREDs in the other two bullets. Thanks, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle, Illinois 60532 (USA) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED],bell-labs.com,acm.org} WWW: http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
