I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-stitching-06.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 2007-08-12 IETF LC End Date: 2007-08-16 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Comments: there are only some editorial comments, i.e., things which should be handled by the RFC editor: - abstract page 2: from from -> from - TOC page 3: for LSP_ATTRIBUTES Object -> for the ...? - 2 page 5: are required -> are required to - 5.1 page 8: LSP ([RFC3473]), to -> LSP ([RFC3473]) to - 5.1.1 page 8: some other e2e LSP. -> some other e2e LSPs.? - 5.1.1 page 8: in the Resv, -> in the Resv message, - 5.1.1.1 page 9: in the Resv Label. -> in the Resv message.? - 5.1.2 page 10: bandwidth, local TE -> bandwidth or local TE - 5.1.2 page 11: a Path Msg -> a Path message - 5.1.2 page 11: a PathErr with the error codes -> a PathErr message with the error code? - 5.1.3 page 11: I can't parse this sentence (commas?): An e2e LSP traversing an S-LSP, SHOULD record in the RRO for that hop, an identifier corresponding to the S-LSP TE link. - 5.2.3 page 14: PCE -> Path Computation Element - 10 page 18: please add ", USA" after ZIP codes. Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
