On 13 Sep 2007 at 18:10 +0300, Pekka Savola allegedly wrote: > > 2.1.1: > > > > Change "PIM-SSM" to "PIM-SM". > > Not sure if I understand this comment. I guess you're referring to > "xxx; PIM-SSM is a subset of PIM-SM." but I don't understand why SSM > should be changed to SM. Yep, it's sometimes confusing that people > use the term PIM-SSM to refer to the part of PIM-SM spec that's needed > if you did only SSM, but I guess it can't be helped.
That's my fault for reading too fast. Pretend it never happened. :-) _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
