Updating my Gen-ART Last Call review:

My comment #2 is addressed by the RFC Editor note currently
in the tracker; and comment #3 has been taken care of as well.

Comment #1 could be addressed by RFC Editor note, too,
as suggested by the authors (email from Jean-Louis Le Roux
on May 30th):

> So we will remove the sentence "[IS-IS-CAP] defines a 
> new code point registry for sub-TLVs carried in the ISIS 
> CAPABILITY TLV" and replace by "IANA has defined a registry 
> for sub-TLVs of the IS-IS CAPABILITY TLV"

Best regards,
Pasi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eronen Pasi (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki) 
> Sent: 30 May, 2007 12:50
> To: '[email protected]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05 
> 
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call 
> comments you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05 
> Reviewer: Pasi Eronen
> Review Date: 30 May 2007
> IETF LC End Date: 06 June 2007
> IESG Telechat date: (not known yet)
> 
> Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits
> that should be fixed before publication.
> 
> Comments:
> 
> 1) Section 8.2 "[IS-IS-CAP] defines a new code point registry for
> sub-TLVs carried in the ISIS CAPABILITY TLV". The current version of
> [IS-IS-CAP] does not seem to define any new IANA-maintained
> registries. This may be an bug in [IS-IS-CAP]?
> 
> 2) Section 8.3: the bit numbers in this section don't match the bit
> numbers in Sections 4.1/4.2.
> 
> 3) As noted in the proto write-up, there's a normative downref (RFC
> 3784). This downref was not called out in the IETF last call message,
> and it's not listed in the downref registry.
> 
> Best regards,
> Pasi
> 


_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to