I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udplist-mib-01.txt
Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Review Date: 2007-09-24
IETF LC End Date: 2007-09-26
Summary: The document is ready for publication as a standard track RFC.
Comments: The document is well written and fortunately contains numerous
pointers to the baseline UDP MIB specification.
I have a comment with respect the normative statements that appear in
towards the end of Section 4, using the terms "RECOMMENDED" and "NOT
RECOMMENDED". The text I refer to is this one:
Further, deployment of SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 is NOT
RECOMMENDED. Instead, it is RECOMMENDED to deploy SNMPv3 and to
enable cryptographic security.
I think the text is speaking about *deployment*, not about
*implementation* of a feature. RFC 2119 only considers implementation,
but not deployment issues, so in my opinion the upper case should not
apply. Additionally, please notice that RFC 2119 does not define the
term "NOT RECOMMENDED", so, it certainly has little meaning in uppercase.
/Miguel
--
Miguel A. Garcia tel:+358-50-4804586
Nokia Siemens Networks Espoo, Finland
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
