Hi,
This is fine, thanks.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
University of Auckland
On 2007-10-10 10:50, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:
Brian: On Sept. 30, 2007 you had sent me some feedback as part
of the GEN-Art review of draft-ietf-sipping-ipv6-torture-tests-03.txt.
The draft has been updated as discussed in email with a new
test case covering the issue you raised (see
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg02272.html
for your review.) The new test case is in Section 4.10 of the
-04 draft. Will you please eyeball the test case and let me know
if it is okay?
The URL for the revised draft (-04) is:
https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/gurbani/sipping-ipv6-torture-tests/draft-ietf-sipping-ipv6-torture-tests-04.html
A diff between -04 and -03 is at:
http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=http://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/gurbani/sipping-ipv6-torture-tests/draft-ietf-sipping-ipv6-torture-tests-03.txt&url2=http://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/gurbani/sipping-ipv6-torture-tests/draft-ietf-sipping-ipv6-torture-tests-04.txt
Thanks for your time.
Regards,
- vijay
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
