Gonzalo:
Thank you very much for the review.
Sorry for the delay in replying, I am currently on the road out of the office.
I will make the modification to the draft as you indicated.
I may not be able to get the changes in until Friday Oct 12 or over
the weekend.
But I will try to get them in earlier if possible.
Magnus, ADs/Chairs:
After I make the changes, should I submit a new version to "ietf-drafts" ??
Thank you very much for your guidance.
-- Kwok --
At 02:45 AM 10/9/2007, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
Hi,
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Draft: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr-04.txt
Reviewer: Gonzalo Camarillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Review Date: 8 October 2007
Summary:
This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should
be fixed before publication.
Comments:
This draft is Informational and does not seem to contain any normative
text. If this is actually the case, Section 1.1 with its reference to
RFC 2119 should be removed.
A set of acronyms are not expanded. They should be expanded on their
first use.
References [1] and [2] are never used in the text.
Abstracts should not contain references.
Thanks,
Gonzalo
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
