Brian,
Great, thanks!
--
Eric Gray
Principal Engineer
Ericsson
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 10:39 PM
> To: Eric Gray
> Cc: Jari Arkko; Iljitsch van Beijnum; Mark Townsley; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of
> draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-09
> Importance: High
>
> Eric,
>
> > Since there are no IANA considerations, where is the Keep-Alive
> > message type defined?
> >
> See below- already fixed in the tracker!
>
> Brian
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection
> (Failure Detection and Locator Pair Exploration Protocol for IPv6
> Multihoming) to Proposed Standard
> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:14:29 +0200
> From: Jari Arkko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Brian E Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: IESG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Iljitsch van Beijnum
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Geoff Huston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Yes. Thanks.
>
> Mark, can you place this to the RFC Editor notes window
> in the tracker:
>
> Please change the contents of Section 9 as follows:
>
> OLD:
> No IANA actions are required.
> NEW:
> The relevant Shim6 message types and their registries are
> defined in [draft-ietf-shim6-proto]. This document has no
> additional IANA considerations.
>
> Jari
>
> Brian E Carpenter kirjoitti:
> > Minor editorial:
> >
> > I think the IANA Considerations should state that the
> > relevant shim6 message types and their registry are
> > defined in draft-ietf-shim6-proto.
> >
> > Brian
>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
