Absolutely. > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 10:40 AM > To: Luther Martin; Mark Schertler > Cc: Tim Polk; [email protected] > Subject: RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-smime-bfibecms-07.txt > > Luther, > > I apologize if I should know this, but I do not. Have > you posted a revised draft? > > -- > Eric Gray > Principal Engineer > Ericsson > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Luther Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 4:10 PM > > To: Eric Gray; Mark Schertler > > Cc: Tim Polk; [email protected] > > Subject: RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-smime-bfibecms-07.txt > > Importance: High > > > > Comments in-line. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Eric Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 11:20 AM > > > To: Luther Martin; Mark Schertler > > > Cc: Tim Polk; [email protected] > > > Subject: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-smime-bfibecms-07.txt > > > > > > Authors, > > > > > > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) > > > reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see > > > http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). > > > > > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last > > Call comments > > > you may receive. > > > > > > > > > > > > Document: > > > > > > "Using the Boneh-Franklin and Boneh-Boyen identity-based > > > encryption algorithms with the Cryptographic Message Syntax" > > > (draft-ietf-smime-bfibecms-07.txt) > > > > > > Reviewer: Eric Gray > > > Review Date: 10/25/2007 > > > IETF LC End Date: 10/25/2007 > > > > > > Summary: > > > ======= > > > > > > This draft is almost ready for publishing as a Proposed Standard. > > > > > > I have some questions and comments below. > > > > > > Comments: > > > ======== > > > > > > Question: In the second bullet, of section 1.2 on page 3, what > > > does the expression "secure distribution" mean? Is the PPS an > > > authenticate-able source, does it only distribute the "publicly > > > sharable cryptographic material" to authenticated recipients or > > > does it use secure connections in the distribution process? > > > > Changed to reflect this comment. > > > > > > > > From the discussion in section 7.1 (second paragraph), it looks > > > as if a PPS is an authenticate-able source. Should this be > > > stated more clearly? > > > > Changed to reflect this comment. > > > > > ________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > [DER] is listed as an informative reference, yet text on page > > > 5 says - > > > > > > "the structure MUST be DER encoded [DER] ..." > > > > > > This should warrant a Normative reference, since it seems it > > > is necessary to have this information in order to implement > > > the step described in this text. > > > > > > A similar argument can be made for each of the following: > > > > > > ASN1 (see reference toward the top of page 3) > > > IBCS (see references at the top of page 8) > > > IBE (see - in particular - process step references - > > > section 4, bullet 1, page 7 > > > section 5, bullets 3 through 5, page 8) > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > > Changed to reflect this comment. > > > > > > > > NITs: > > > ==== > > > > > > There are format problems (premature line-wrap) that should be > > > fixed prior to publication (this probably can be handled as an > > > RFC Editor's note). See, for example, numbered bullets on page > > > 6 (number 2 in the first set, and number 4 in the second). > > > > Changed to reflect this comment. > > > >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
