I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-sipping-capacity-attribute-05.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2007-12-03
IETF LC End Date: 2007-12-20
IESG Telechat date: (if known)
Summary: Almost ready, one formal problem
Comments:
Section 4 (but this also affects other sections):
... URI-list servers can use URIs
tagged with the 'anonymize' attribute for routing SIP requests, but
MUST convert them to an anonymized URI (such as
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) in recipient-history lists.
Formally, that is a perfectly valid URI (since the TLD 'invalid'
could be registered by IANA). I think that to be correct, the anonymous
URI should be well-defined, e.g. register a URI scheme 'anon' for
the purpose, and specify that the URI MUST be "anon:anonymous".
Also, but less important: There's a booby-trap in blind-copied email,
namely sending a reply-all without noticing that you've been blind-copied.
Would it be useful to add a 'blind-copy' attribute for Bcc recipients,
so that they can easily know about it?
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
