I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-dccp-dtls-05.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2008-02-26
IETF LC End Date: 2008-03-25
IESG Telechat date: (if known)

Summary: Almost ready, small clarifications suggested.

Comments: 

   Multiple DTLS
   records MAY be sent in one DCCP-Data packet, as long as the resulting
   packet is within the Path Maximum Transfer Unit (PMTU) currently in
   force for normal data packets, if the Don't Fragment (DF) bit is
   being used, or within the current DCCP maximum packet size if the DF
   bit is not being used (see section 3.5 for more information on PMTU
   Discovery). 

This sentence needs to be split into two cases: IPv4 (in which case the
DF bit exists) and IPv6 (where DF doesn't exist).

   DTLS handshake messages can be quite large, theoretically up to 2^24-
   1 bytes and in practice often many kilobytes.  Subsequently, unlike
   other DTLS messages, the handshake messages may be fragmented over
   multiple DTLS records.  

"Subsequently" confused me greatly until I realised that probably it
was supposed to be "consequently."

 
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to