On 2008-03-31 04:49, Ned Freed wrote: ... > In any case, I've now posted a revised version that incorporates all of these > changes.
Thanks Ned, that looks good to me. (In the event that 2821bis is approved in time, the RFC Editor could update the citation of 2821. But that seems to be a slightly more controversial Last Call.) > And thanks for the feedback. You're very welcome. Brian _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
