We can re-upload another version if that helps?
Cheers,
Silvia.

On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Magnus Westerlund
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the review.
>
> Regarding the normative reference. I did make a mistake to not call this
> out. However, also RFC 3534 did have this reference so I didn't think that
> much about it. I will figure out if I need to repeat the last call using the
> RFC 3967 process.
>
> Cheers
>
> Magnus
>
> Gonzalo Camarillo skrev:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
>> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
>> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
>>
>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
>> you may receive.
>>
>>
>> Draft: draft-goncalves-rfc3534bis-07.txt
>> Reviewer: Gonzalo Camarillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Review Date: 10 June 2008
>>
>> Summary:
>>
>> This draft is ready for publication as a PS RFC.
>>
>> Comments:
>>
>> There is a normative reference  to RFC 3533, which is Informational.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
> IETF Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                | Phone +46 8 4048287
> Färögatan 6                | Fax   +46 8 7575550
> S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to