A short note on:
I am rather surprised that it is proposed to assign a "vendor-specific"
application identifier when the primary usage is not specific to a vendor;
an ITU-T Recommendation is not a vendor. RFC3588 says
"Vendor-Specific Application Identifiers, are for Private Use." This is
not for private use. Why isn't this a standards track application identifier?
This is common practise in this space to use the so-called vendor-specific space for SDOs. The same approach is applied in RADIUS as well.
When you look at the enterprise numbers
http://www.iana.org/assignments/enterprise-numbers
then you will notice that there are a couple of SDOs in there:
24757: WiMAX Forum
5535: 3rd Generation Partnership Project 2 (3GPP2)
10415: 3GPP
We use this approach already for many years in Diameter.
Ciao
Hannes
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
