Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
2) As a matter of personal taste, I don't like to mention names of
working groups in RFCs. This is because WGs are temporal arrangements.
They stop existing after a few years, while RFCs are permanent. So,
"BEHAVE" might not mean anything in the near future. This comment is due
to the reference to "BEHAVE" in the abstract.
So like "published by the IETF" instead of "published by the BEHAVE wg"?
Yeap, I think your proposal sounds fine.
/Miguel
--
Miguel A. Garcia
+34-91-339-3608
Ericsson Spain
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
