I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-radext-management-authorization-06.txt Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani Review Date: 11 Nov. 2008 IETF LC End Date: 11 Nov. 2008 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. A couple feedback items follow: - S1: The last two paragraphs of this section compare some terms used in this draft against similar terms in SNMP. I am curious: why the explicit call-out and comparison of these terms in SNMP? Does SNMP have a special relationship to this draft that requires that a difference be explicitly established vis-a-vis certain terms? I just found that more distracting then helpful. Of course, you may have a valid enough reason for this comparison, and if so, providing the reason to the reader will help in setting up the context. - S5.3: Below the figure, the Length is shown as ">= 3". However, the Text field expects "one or more octets..." Should not the Length then be ">= 1"? Thanks, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED],bell-labs.com,acm.org} WWW: http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
