After a lengthy private discussion with Carlos, and some serious "quality time" spent with RFC 2661 ;-), here's where I think the two major issues from my Gen-ART review of this draft stand:
(1) AVP for softwire profile of L2TPv2. I'm no longer convinced that a new AVP is needed, but the specification of the profile needs significant clarification and cleanup. For example, what happens if a softwire implementation of L2TPv2 happens to receive an OCRQ message? This has also turned up a topic that needs to be covered in the Security Considerations section - a brief discussion of the security consequences of the recommendation not to hide AVPs. (2) RFC 5405 and UDP. In addition to referencing RFC 5405, a recommendation for L2TPv2 use of PMTUD will be added. Thanks, --David ---------------------------------------------------- David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 black_da...@emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 ---------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
