I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-04.txt Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review Date: 2009-01-24 IESG Telechat date: 29 January 2009 Summary: Almost ready Comments: My Last Call comments were addressed, thanks. I did notice one more minor point: > 11. IANA Considerations ... > The "Traffic-action" extended community defined in this document has > 6 unused bits which can be used to convey additional meaning. > Authors would like to ask IANA to create and maintain a new registry > entitled: "Traffic Action Fields". These values should be assigned > via IETF Consensus rules only. RFC5226 doesn't describe a policy called "IETF Consensus". It has been replaced by "IETF Review". This could be fixed by a note to the RFC Editor.
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
