I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-ipfix-mib-06.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2009-04-02
IETF LC End Date: 2009-04-03
IESG Telechat date: (if known)
Summary: Ready
--------
Comments:
---------
The technical description is clear and did not raise any questions in my
mind. I did not check the MIB module in detail.
Editorial issues:
-----------------
I question whether this document really needs the pre-5378
disclaimer ("This document may contain material from IETF Documents
or IETF Contributions published or made publicly available before
November 10, 2008..."). There is nothing in the Acknowledgments
or anywhere else to suggest that it incorporates any such text.
So why is it there?
This could matter, since a reader who doesn't actually understand
the rules in detail might conclude that extracting the MIB text and
including it in a product is not allowed, whereas *every* version
of the IETF copyright rules has allowed this. It would be better
if the disclaimer can be dropped from the RFC.
== Outdated reference: draft-ietf-ipfix-architecture has been published as
RFC 5470
== Outdated reference: draft-ietf-ipfix-as has been published as RFC 5472
== Outdated reference: draft-ietf-psamp-framework has been published as RFC
5474
== Outdated reference: draft-ietf-psamp-sample-tech has been published as
RFC 5475
== Outdated reference: draft-ietf-psamp-protocol has been published as RFC
5476_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
