Hi, I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Draft: draft-ietf-radext-design-07.txt Reviewer: Gonzalo Camarillo <[email protected]> Review Date: 8 April 2009 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a BCP RFC. Comments: ID nits complains that reference [8] appears in Appendix B.6 but not in the References. The Introduction Section should be a non-normative section. However, Section 1.1 uses normative statements (RECOMMENDED and NOT RECOMMENDED) before those terms are defined in Section 1.3. The acronym AAA should be expanded. When referring to the appendixes, I think the draft should talk about appendixes, not about sections. For example, it should talk about Appendix A.5, not about Section A.5. Thanks, Gonzalo _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
