I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-dccp-simul-open-07.txt Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <[email protected]> Review Date: 2009-04-28 IETF LC End Date: 2009-04-30 Summary: This document is ready for publication as a standards track RFC. Major issues: none Minor issues: noneNits/editorial comments: Just a couple of minor nits, in case you need to do a revision of the document.
- In Section 1.1, first sentence, the sentence should probably say "a DCCP server is located inside ***the perimeter controlled by*** a middlebox".
The same comment is also applicable to the second paragraph in Section 1.2.- In Section 2.2.1, the fourth bullet point under Figure 1 seems to miss something to be readable. The text reads:
"...is not related to the DCCP sequence number for normal DCCP messages Section 3".
perhaps it should be"...is not related to the DCCP sequence number for normal DCCP messages (see Section 3.1.1 for a description of the use of the DCCP sequence number)".
- The next sub-bullet point under the above. The text reads:"A DCCP server should set the high and low bits of the Sequence Number field to 0".
Question, shouldn't the "should" be a normative "SHOULD"? - IANA Considerations section. The text reads. "The decimal value 10 has been assigned to this types". First, s/types/typeSecond, has this value really been already assigned? Typically IANA allocates this numbers at the late stages of the process, so, I would have expected that the sentence should be a suggestion to IANA rather than a firm statement.
/Miguel -- Miguel A. Garcia +34-91-339-3608 Ericsson Spain
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
