I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document: draft-ietf-isms-tmsm-17.txt
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: May 1, 2009
IESG Telechat date: May 7, 2009
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard.
I had reviewed tmsm-16 earlier and had found 0 major issues,
0 minor issues and 1 Nits/Editorial. The Nits/Editorial is
still there in -17, but I don't think it is important
enough to stop the press.
For completeness, here is the Nits/Editorial:
1) The references appear to be off key; i.e., there is a lot
of space between the reference identifier and the reference
resource; e.g.:
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for
use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels",
BCP 14, RFC 2119,
March 1997.
instead of
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
Maybe some formatting problem?
Thanks,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: v...@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
WWW: http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
