Thanks Sean,
Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication (informational
with no RFC 2119 requirements terminology), but has nits that should be
fixed before publication.
I ran it through ID-nits:
- is a pre-5378 disclaimer needed?
Will look at this, but I believe not.
- draft-ietf-pce-brpc has been published as RFC 5441
- draft-ietf-pce-path-key has been published as RFC 5520
I'm sure the RFC editor will tidy up all references, but we will fix if a
new revision gets spun first.
In 5.1, there's missing reference: PCEP [ <a href="'>RFC5440]
Looks like the usual problem with the RFC database. Sometimes the database
and idnits get out of synch on recently published RFCs with the result that
the references appear bogus. But RFC5440 is alive and well.
Cheers,
Adrian
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
