I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-l2tpext-circuit-status-extensions-04 Reviewer: Pete McCann Review Date: 15 June 2009 IETF LC End Date: 16 June 2009 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Basically ready, one minor question Major issues: none Minor issues: Section 2: setting of in the Did you mean: setting of the N bit in the ? In deprecating this N bit, will there be compatibility problems if an implementation sends ICRQ, ICRP, OCRQ, or OCRP with the N bit clear? Is it possible that older implementations would treat this as an invalid message? Nits/editorial comments: none _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
