I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for
draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd-04.txt
For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as Informational RFC
but I have a few comments
Substantial
===========
Section 2.6.4.1
* It is possible that I missed something but I did not see the function
"F" defined in this document.
e.g. -> compute ks = F(KS)
Minor
=====
* IANA considerations : Random function
The "Specification required" policy already implies use of a designated
expert and hence the "and Expert Review" clause is not needed.
* The word hunt-and-peck used in the document is not very well defined.
I have seen this being used to describe inexperienced typists but I
could not see how to apply the analogy to this EAP method.
Process
=======
* The draft mentions that it is on the Standards track, but the tracker
says it is Informational. Please update the draft to reflect the
proposed status.
Thanks
Suresh
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
