Brian, Many thanks for your review !
Ron, Brian, Regarding the concern about 2119 keywords (Gen-ART issue 1), I wonder if doing away with them would be too drastic, considering that all the more recent bmwg methodology RFC and I-Ds do use them. I agree that the cases that were highlighted need fixing. Regarding issue 2: good point, we will fix it saying explicitly why cases 6-8 are not covered. Thanks, -- Carlos. -----Original Message----- From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:55 PM To: Ron Bonica Cc: Aamer Akhter (aakhter); General Area Review Team; [email protected]; Rajiv Asati (rajiva); Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bmwg-mpls-forwarding-meth-05.txt This is a manual repeat as I have been getting error messages from the tools server on the authors' address alias. Hi Ron, That would work for me. However, I don't see this as a show-stopper necessarily; it depends whether the IESG wants to be picky about this issue for an Informational. Not my call. Brian On 2009-08-25 03:11, Ron Bonica wrote: > Could we address this issue dispensing with 2119 language altogether > (i.e. convert to lower case). > > Ron > > > Brian E Carpenter wrote: > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
