Hi Brian,
My bad. I entered the writeup in the old tracker. I will fix that. In
the mean time, a copy of the write-up is appended to this email.
We chose BCP because this draft doesn't define anything new on the wire.
It's just a subset of IGMP. But we would just as happy to call this a PS.
Ron
WRITE-UP
========
Technical Summary
This document describes lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 protocols (LW-
IGMPv3 and LW-MLDv2), which simplify the standard (full) versions of
IGMPv3 and MLDv2. The interoperability with the full versions and
the previous versions of IGMP and MLD is also taken into account.
Working Group Summary
This draft has received strong support within the working group and
no major controversies were noted.
Document Quality
Multiple implementations of this specification exist. A number of
other vendors have indicated interest/plans to support this
specification. Bharat Joshi provided the most extensive comments
and questions for the document. Authors addressed the questions and
concerns in the document. Otherwise, mailing list traffic regarding
this specification has been minimal. There has been extensive
comments on this proposal during the working group meetings.
Personnel
Lenny Giuliano is the Document Shepherd, Ron Bonica is the
Responsible Area Director.
RFC Editor Note
(Insert RFC Editor Note here or remove section)
IRTF Note
(Insert IRTF Note here or remove section)
IESG Note
(Insert IESG Note here or remove section)
IANA Note
(Insert IANA Note here or remove section)
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art