Thanks for your review. I'm sorry I didn't have a chance to look at this last week, but I was travelling on other business.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:30:20AM +0300, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: > > This draft is ready for publication as a PS RFC. > > Comments: > > Acronyms should be expanded on their first use (including the title of > the draft and the Abstract). Were there any specific ones you noted apart from in the Abstract? I thought I'd caught them all when I did my review, but of course this has been around a long time and I might have missed some. In any case, we can fix this up for sure. > The paragraph referencing RFC 2119 is located at the end of the > Introduction. Normally, it is placed in a section on its own called > Terminology instead, which comes right after the Introduction. This is > truly a very minor comment and I leave it up to the author to decide > whether to leave it as is or to move the text into a new section. We can move it. Thanks again for your review. Best regards, Andrew (shepherd) -- Andrew Sullivan [email protected] Shinkuro, Inc. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
