Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
The draft was initially proposed as informational but with the
support of the area director, the last call was made to promote it to
a proposed standard. Assuming there is no objection, we would like it
changed to standards track.
Eran: That is for the AD and/or the WG to decide.
What we can do is include an appendix with the list of all known
well-known locations outside the new prefix to help in documenting
existing practices. However, that is not likely to be complete and
might cause a long delay in publication.
Nah, don't worry. I was mostly curious to see if grand-fathering
made sense here, and it appears from your arguments that it may
hurt more than help.
I don't have any further comments on the document.
Thanks,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: v...@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
