Miguel, this document is going for Experimental RFC. Thus the first is
clearly not an downref. We currently are discussing what status the
QSPEC doc really should have.

/Magnus

Miguel A. Garcia skrev:
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-nsis-qos-nslp-17.txt
> Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <[email protected]>
> Review Date: 2009-11-26
> IETF LC End Date: 2009-11-26
> 
> Summary: The document is ready for publication as a standards track RFC.
> 
> I must say that I didn't have time to review the whole document, but
> just about 25% of it. I also reviewed the IANA considerations section. I
> found a quality and well written draft, with just a couple of nits.
> 
> Note that idnits reports two cases of downref:
>   ** Downref: Normative reference to an Experimental draft:
>      draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp (ref. 'I-D.ietf-nsis-ntlp')
> 
>   ** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational draft:
>      draft-ietf-nsis-qspec (ref. 'I-D.ietf-nsis-qspec')
> 
> From my perspective, the document seems to be ready for publication.
> 
> /Miguel


-- 

Magnus Westerlund

IETF Transport Area Director
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: [email protected]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to