> -----Original Message----- > From: young [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 1:10 PM > To: 'Elwyn Davies'; 'General Area Reviwing Team'; Romascanu, Dan (Dan) > Cc: 'Mary Barnes'; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Richard's comments to the Gen-art review of > draft-ietf-capwap-802dot11-mib-05.txt > > Hi, Elwyn: > > Thanks. Please check my comments. > > s3: WLAN is defined but no expansion of the acronym is given. > [Editors] > It (WLAN) is got from the RFC5416 and the RFC5416 does not > give any expansion of the acronym. > The issue here is: If we give an expansion to the WLAN (in > the RFC5416), readers would be confused with the WLAN > (wireless local area networks) in the IEEE 802.11. > You know: The RFC5416 talks about WLAN as a logic service, > while the IEEE > 802.11 > talks about it as certain network. > Dan or CAPWAP chairs, please give some guidance here. Thanks. >
I believe that the comment is valid, especially if more than one meaning (or nuances of the same meaning) may hide behind the acronym. My proposal is to expand and to clarify how the term is used in this document. Dan _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
